• Photo Projects
    • 2019 Photos
    • 2020 Photos
    • 2021 Photos
    • 2022 Photos
  • Home
  • Learning From Others
  • From the Fog
  • Reading Notes
  • About
Menu

Lions In The Fog

SJ Ryan's Blog
  • Photo Projects
  • Archives
    • 2019 Photos
    • 2020 Photos
    • 2021 Photos
    • 2022 Photos
  • Home
  • Learning From Others
  • From the Fog
  • Reading Notes
  • About

No matter how good a lion you are, you can’t see well if you’re surrounded by nothing but fog.

No results found

Featured posts:

Featured
Are We Biased Against Hard Work?
May 31, 2021
Are We Biased Against Hard Work?
May 31, 2021

The naturalness bias may push us away from fairly evaluating people who have had to work hard for success and towards people who seem like “natural” successes — even when we say we value the things the strivers are living.

Read more →
May 31, 2021
GMLordstown.png
August 4, 2020
What Business Are You In?
August 4, 2020

Change is a given in life and work, but we frequently anchor our identity in the past or to things we cannot control. There is a huge difference between being attached to a durable, lasting sense of mission (“what” and “why” we do things) rather than our business models (“how” and “where”). Getting the two confused can have a terrible price.

Read more →
August 4, 2020
Pace Yourself
July 30, 2020
Pace Yourself
July 30, 2020

Ever been told “it’s a marathon, not a sprint?” Most people intuitively understand the suggestion that we should start slow and conserve our energy. Even if you’re someone who only runs when being chased, we can still learn from this.

Read more →
July 30, 2020
obstacles.jpg
July 28, 2020
Falling Off The Path
July 28, 2020

All of us have ambitions, and all of those come with a list of things that need to be done to see them through. But there are always temptations to do things which don’t help advance our cause. We unpack advice on dealing with the real source of our issues.

Read more →
July 28, 2020
July 28, 2020
Advanced Leadership: Trust and Responsibility
July 28, 2020

High-performing organizations choose to empower and trust their employees to do the right thing. They also enforce accountability for those standards. The alternative is to try to micro-manage each individual, which creates oppressive organizational cultures and environments, and eventually saps the employees and the organization of vitality.

Read more →
July 28, 2020
Screenshot from 2020-07-26 15-29-44.png
July 27, 2020
Do We Crawl, Walk or Run?
July 27, 2020

There is plenty of glittering advice that promises to catapult us and our work into the next realm of performance. Before we embrace this advice, we should be sure that we and our organizations are ready for it.

Read more →
July 27, 2020
Koetoezov_kazan cc-by-sa Errabee.jpg
July 15, 2020
Don't Forget Context When Offering Advice
July 15, 2020

The Harvard Business Review article, “Look to Military History for Lessons in Crisis Leadership” offers Covid-era leaders advice drawn from throughout military history. Much of the advice, though, needs more nuance and context to be fully applicable to modern leaders.

Read more →
July 15, 2020
June 29, 2020
And Then What?
June 29, 2020

Slogans capture and channel our dreams. Iteration, adaptation, and the hard work of implementation make them real. Pausing to ask “And then what?” isn’t an admission of defeat. It’s a sign of wisdom and maturity, a willingness to at least start trying to think more deeply about complex and troubling problems.

Read more →
June 29, 2020
netflix slide 80.png
June 23, 2020
Are You Sabotaging Your Own Strategy?
June 23, 2020

Change is in the air. As we enter mid-2020, organizations and populations everywhere are grappling with a series of powerful social, economic and political shocks. There has never been safety in clinging to the status quo, but it is even less of an option now.

Read more →
June 23, 2020
May 21, 2020
When Is It Okay to Quit?
May 21, 2020

It’s said that quitters never win and winners never quit, but is this true? For highly motivated people, the drive to achieve can be a direct line to accomplishment or into a dead end. The key is the ability to discern when our goals no longer suit us. Ironically, this can be hardest for the best-motivated.

Read more →
May 21, 2020

“When all else fails, blow up a bunch of stuff and hope for the best.” —Outcast Marines tactical plan

Outcast Marines

November 13, 2021

 Outcast Marines (Boxed Set), James David Victor. I really, really wanted to both like this and finish it. Both objectives were ultimately out of reach. The concept seemed promising--I had been interested in comparing it to Chaney and Brazee’s Sentenced To War (here) given similar premises. The protagonist, a criminal fresh off of the untimely, unseemly death of his best friend, is judicially shanghai’ed into what comes off as a mildly futuristic penal battalion. All manner of intrigue and adventure ensue.

 The adventure part was done decently, and it appeared some effort had gone into trying to write some verve into what’s going on. The problem was that I found it almost impossible to maintain my immersion into the story. Like a lot of what’s put out by volume-oriented writers (or writing teams) the product comes across as about one or two serious revisions short of what could have been really fun reading.

 A couple of specific nits to pick:

 · Technology: There is some sort of faster-than-light transportation available to humans, but the rest of the technology seems out of sync. At one point lead misfit Solomon is shot, through an armored suit, with what appears to be a 20th century bullet. Why is anyone using these when there are actual, you know, sci-fi weapons in the book? This is what I meant when I suggested the setting was “mildly futuristic”--there are hints of great technological advances, but they’re applied wildly unevenly across the story. Dune can (arguably) get away with this sort of thing, but it didn’t work here.

 · Physics: There is a potentially great scene with dueling rescue ships arriving at the site of a calamitous incident. It’s undercut when one of the ships hails the other and tells them to move away...using a loudspeaker?

 It was the Marine transporter. ATTENTION, MARTIAN VESSEL! The transporter boomed its message out across the Titan landscape. YOU ARE AN ILLEGAL VESSEL IN A RESTRICTED-ACCESS FACILITY! LEAVE IMMEDIATELY OR WE WILL BE FORCED TO FIRE UPON YOU!

 There is also a description of the ships entering Titan’s atmosphere which appears to confuse where all the heat from reentry would come from. This is too bad. Victor made an effort to be at least a little realistic in other ways. For example, specifying that humanity is short of the special FTL drives which are very rare and very difficult to build, therefore realistically bestowing a competitive advantage on the side which makes them.

 · Character development/Plot: At least there is some! But a lot of it is stilted. From a critical moment in the story:

 As much as she wanted to run down the ramp to find them, to drag them out, every hour of Marine training and before that her Yakuza training dictated the same thing: save what you can, what’s in front of you. Don’t throw your life away on an uncertainty.

 “Save what you can, what’s in front of you” seems like an unlikely philosophy for either the Yakuza or an organized military. Particularly when both groups spend the first book executing devious and distinctly long-term plans around the main characters.

 I was supposed to be the one to kill Solomon Cready, she thought miserably as she turned to follow the ambassador. She had also been tasked to protect the Ambassador to Earth. In a way, I’m still killing him by abandoning him down there. She gritted her teeth as she ran, blinking back the tears that had suddenly sprung into her eyes.

And her feelings about killing Cready appear less “mixed” than simply “confused.” This could and should be an important fulcrum for building some tension into the storyline, but it just comes across here as hastily-written.

Oh, and confession: initially, I thought these examples which came from a female character could simply be a male author who was uncomfortable extending their writing style to a feminine point of view. It turns out, not so much (see below).

· Clarity in descriptions: Two examples come to mind here.

Steam was escaping and being released constantly at odd intervals, and the strung lights flickered here and there as announcements in different languages beckoned staff to this docking procedure or that loading one.

 This does create a mental image of what’s happening in the setting (a space station) but it’s a weird pseudo-Steampunk one which doesn’t match the rest of the story.

 Computer systems and pipelines would have ruptured, creating a firestorm that only those in full protective suits could have survived.

 Ruptured pipeline = firestorm. Sure, check. Would the computers have ruptured, too? Why? Are they spewing particularly flammable electrons? This is less about the physics or engineering than just being careful about the writing.


James David Victor…both of them!

 To digress briefly, there is a really interesting point about this series: there is no James David Victor. Or rather, there is, but it’s not one person. JDV is a collective pen name for Shannon and Dave VanBergen, two authors with very different individual bodies of writing (Amazon says Shannon writes the Glock Grannies. These are “cozy mysteries” -- a sub-genre I can’t quite wrap my head around. But that’s definitely me, not her.) So that was mildly cool, and partly explains what seems to be “Victor” achieving such voluminous production.


 Again, this isn’t a terrible series of books. It’s more like a good recipie which has been poorly executed: the basic pieces are there, but it’s been executed in a rush. Put another way, it’s hard to get and stay immersed in the story when there’s essentially a small papercut every few pages. At a staggering 1,317 pages that’s a ton of papercuts.

Smirk index: 7 uses -- Acceptable (1pt)

Immersion factor: Shallow (1pts)

Writing quality: Average (1pts)

Plot/character development: Average (1 pts)

Interest/innovation factor: Moderate (1pts)

 Total: 5/10

 

 

← November ChillsExperimental Rating System →
Back to Top

email: sjr@gmx.us
phone: (571) 366-9110