• Photo Projects
    • 2019 Photos
    • 2020 Photos
    • 2021 Photos
    • 2022 Photos
  • Home
  • Learning From Others
  • From the Fog
  • Reading Notes
  • About
Menu

Lions In The Fog

SJ Ryan's Blog
  • Photo Projects
  • Archives
    • 2019 Photos
    • 2020 Photos
    • 2021 Photos
    • 2022 Photos
  • Home
  • Learning From Others
  • From the Fog
  • Reading Notes
  • About

No matter how good a lion you are, you can’t see well if you’re surrounded by nothing but fog.

No results found

Featured posts:

Featured
Are We Biased Against Hard Work?
May 31, 2021
Are We Biased Against Hard Work?
May 31, 2021

The naturalness bias may push us away from fairly evaluating people who have had to work hard for success and towards people who seem like “natural” successes — even when we say we value the things the strivers are living.

Read more →
May 31, 2021
GMLordstown.png
August 4, 2020
What Business Are You In?
August 4, 2020

Change is a given in life and work, but we frequently anchor our identity in the past or to things we cannot control. There is a huge difference between being attached to a durable, lasting sense of mission (“what” and “why” we do things) rather than our business models (“how” and “where”). Getting the two confused can have a terrible price.

Read more →
August 4, 2020
Pace Yourself
July 30, 2020
Pace Yourself
July 30, 2020

Ever been told “it’s a marathon, not a sprint?” Most people intuitively understand the suggestion that we should start slow and conserve our energy. Even if you’re someone who only runs when being chased, we can still learn from this.

Read more →
July 30, 2020
obstacles.jpg
July 28, 2020
Falling Off The Path
July 28, 2020

All of us have ambitions, and all of those come with a list of things that need to be done to see them through. But there are always temptations to do things which don’t help advance our cause. We unpack advice on dealing with the real source of our issues.

Read more →
July 28, 2020
July 28, 2020
Advanced Leadership: Trust and Responsibility
July 28, 2020

High-performing organizations choose to empower and trust their employees to do the right thing. They also enforce accountability for those standards. The alternative is to try to micro-manage each individual, which creates oppressive organizational cultures and environments, and eventually saps the employees and the organization of vitality.

Read more →
July 28, 2020
Screenshot from 2020-07-26 15-29-44.png
July 27, 2020
Do We Crawl, Walk or Run?
July 27, 2020

There is plenty of glittering advice that promises to catapult us and our work into the next realm of performance. Before we embrace this advice, we should be sure that we and our organizations are ready for it.

Read more →
July 27, 2020
Koetoezov_kazan cc-by-sa Errabee.jpg
July 15, 2020
Don't Forget Context When Offering Advice
July 15, 2020

The Harvard Business Review article, “Look to Military History for Lessons in Crisis Leadership” offers Covid-era leaders advice drawn from throughout military history. Much of the advice, though, needs more nuance and context to be fully applicable to modern leaders.

Read more →
July 15, 2020
June 29, 2020
And Then What?
June 29, 2020

Slogans capture and channel our dreams. Iteration, adaptation, and the hard work of implementation make them real. Pausing to ask “And then what?” isn’t an admission of defeat. It’s a sign of wisdom and maturity, a willingness to at least start trying to think more deeply about complex and troubling problems.

Read more →
June 29, 2020
netflix slide 80.png
June 23, 2020
Are You Sabotaging Your Own Strategy?
June 23, 2020

Change is in the air. As we enter mid-2020, organizations and populations everywhere are grappling with a series of powerful social, economic and political shocks. There has never been safety in clinging to the status quo, but it is even less of an option now.

Read more →
June 23, 2020
May 21, 2020
When Is It Okay to Quit?
May 21, 2020

It’s said that quitters never win and winners never quit, but is this true? For highly motivated people, the drive to achieve can be a direct line to accomplishment or into a dead end. The key is the ability to discern when our goals no longer suit us. Ironically, this can be hardest for the best-motivated.

Read more →
May 21, 2020

The Ghost Galaxy Omnibus

January 15, 2022

Ghost Galaxy Omnibus (Ghost Squadron books 1-7 and Precious Galaxy books 1-4), Sarah Noffke and Michael Anderle. The sheer size of this collection works against it. It’s SF-lite, intended to be fun and frothy. Undercut by thinly-developed characters and deus-ex-machina plot mechanics. Switched from the Ghost Squadron to the Precious Galaxy series at the 4% mark, and didn’t find enough to make me want to go on. The first chapter or two of the first PG book was really solid and encouraging, but it lapsed quickly into the same bad habits as the first book.


Among those bad habits:  

  • Physics:

 Eddie squeezed the grip and pressed it forward, igniting his thrusters and moving ahead. He performed a double roll, then an aileron roll for good measure.

 You did an aileron roll in space? In a vacuum? Okay, maybe with thrusters? Of course, he then goes on to blast an asteroid with bullets a sentence or two later. So maybe he did use his ailerons. Not everything can be The Three Body Problem, but...eh... 

  • Emotions:

 He took off running again, looking forward to seeing the person he’d been dreading all these years.

 How does that work? My experience with emotions is limited, but I think you generally feel one (looking forward) or the other (dread) rather than both. Alternately, this could be read as a badly-written shot at expressing a nuanced and sophisticated inner conflict. That’s almost more disappointing.  

  • Words:

Liesel gave them a commiserate expression.

 “That’s what we have to find out,” Jack said decidedly.

 And somewhere in here (location 20530) someone summated something to someone else.

 These are real words--okay, the first two are--but they’re used badly and repeatedly: five “commiserate” as an adjective, and ten “summated.” (And that’s before getting to the overuse of smirk/smirked.)  

  • Plot:

    There’s a potentially fascinating and exciting sequence a chapter or two into the 8th book where our heroes investigate a shuttle, crewed by a weird robot, which subsequently explodes while they’re in/running away from it. It’s hard to tell because the descriptions are so thin, but it apparently doesn’t damage the ship its docked in--even though if I remembered this right, it’s one deck above a critical area.

After this, one of the heroes discloses finding an important clue while in the now-exploded shuttle, although again we didn’t actually get to explore this with them while it was happening. In response to this, his uncle (and the heroes’ effective boss) then drops some background information which ties the plot together and makes the whole explosion make marginally more sense. The challenge is that the info is the kind of thing which trained professionals (of which we have three in the scene, plus an AI) presumably would have talked before risking rapid unscheduled disassembly. It’s been been withheld because...reasons?  

The plot elements which could have generated some tension and excitement are under-written, and the randomly dropped Important Facts made me wonder if I missed an earlier plot twist or if this had basically been bolted on to the dialog. I suspect the latter.


If this sounds cranky, it is. I sacrificed what could have been a useful extra hour of sleep the night before I wrote this wading through Ghost Galaxy trying to give it a second chance.

 What made me give up was realizing that I felt like I was reading a giant first draft. There’s a ton of potential in the story and characters, but little or no reason to stick around through--checks Amazon--2,352 pages* of poor editing, awkward word choices, shallow characters and an apparently improvised plot. The accumulation of little annoyances wound up far outweighing the potential in the series

 Smirk index: Overdone: 0 points (32 smirks, other annoying stuff.)

Immersion factor: Shallow: 1 point.

Writing quality and interest/innovation: Average-minus: 2 x 0.75 = 1.5 points.

Character/plot development: Average: 1 point.

Total: 3.5/10

 * And dude, seriously? 2001: A Space Odyssey is just under 300 pages. Even the Dune trilogy, which I’d always thought was the standard for could-usefully-have-been-shorter SFF, is “only” 950-some pages. There’s some serious page count envy going on somewhere.

Tags: SF, Self-Published, Michael Anderle, Sarah Noffke, Series
← January: Fruits of Time OffWinding Down 2021 →
Back to Top

email: sjr@gmx.us
phone: (571) 366-9110