• Photo Projects
    • 2019 Photos
    • 2020 Photos
    • 2021 Photos
    • 2022 Photos
  • Home
  • Learning From Others
  • From the Fog
  • Reading Notes
  • About
Menu

Lions In The Fog

SJ Ryan's Blog
  • Photo Projects
  • Archives
    • 2019 Photos
    • 2020 Photos
    • 2021 Photos
    • 2022 Photos
  • Home
  • Learning From Others
  • From the Fog
  • Reading Notes
  • About

No matter how good a lion you are, you can’t see well if you’re surrounded by nothing but fog.

No results found

Featured posts:

Featured
Are We Biased Against Hard Work?
May 31, 2021
Are We Biased Against Hard Work?
May 31, 2021

The naturalness bias may push us away from fairly evaluating people who have had to work hard for success and towards people who seem like “natural” successes — even when we say we value the things the strivers are living.

Read more →
May 31, 2021
GMLordstown.png
August 4, 2020
What Business Are You In?
August 4, 2020

Change is a given in life and work, but we frequently anchor our identity in the past or to things we cannot control. There is a huge difference between being attached to a durable, lasting sense of mission (“what” and “why” we do things) rather than our business models (“how” and “where”). Getting the two confused can have a terrible price.

Read more →
August 4, 2020
Pace Yourself
July 30, 2020
Pace Yourself
July 30, 2020

Ever been told “it’s a marathon, not a sprint?” Most people intuitively understand the suggestion that we should start slow and conserve our energy. Even if you’re someone who only runs when being chased, we can still learn from this.

Read more →
July 30, 2020
obstacles.jpg
July 28, 2020
Falling Off The Path
July 28, 2020

All of us have ambitions, and all of those come with a list of things that need to be done to see them through. But there are always temptations to do things which don’t help advance our cause. We unpack advice on dealing with the real source of our issues.

Read more →
July 28, 2020
July 28, 2020
Advanced Leadership: Trust and Responsibility
July 28, 2020

High-performing organizations choose to empower and trust their employees to do the right thing. They also enforce accountability for those standards. The alternative is to try to micro-manage each individual, which creates oppressive organizational cultures and environments, and eventually saps the employees and the organization of vitality.

Read more →
July 28, 2020
Screenshot from 2020-07-26 15-29-44.png
July 27, 2020
Do We Crawl, Walk or Run?
July 27, 2020

There is plenty of glittering advice that promises to catapult us and our work into the next realm of performance. Before we embrace this advice, we should be sure that we and our organizations are ready for it.

Read more →
July 27, 2020
Koetoezov_kazan cc-by-sa Errabee.jpg
July 15, 2020
Don't Forget Context When Offering Advice
July 15, 2020

The Harvard Business Review article, “Look to Military History for Lessons in Crisis Leadership” offers Covid-era leaders advice drawn from throughout military history. Much of the advice, though, needs more nuance and context to be fully applicable to modern leaders.

Read more →
July 15, 2020
June 29, 2020
And Then What?
June 29, 2020

Slogans capture and channel our dreams. Iteration, adaptation, and the hard work of implementation make them real. Pausing to ask “And then what?” isn’t an admission of defeat. It’s a sign of wisdom and maturity, a willingness to at least start trying to think more deeply about complex and troubling problems.

Read more →
June 29, 2020
netflix slide 80.png
June 23, 2020
Are You Sabotaging Your Own Strategy?
June 23, 2020

Change is in the air. As we enter mid-2020, organizations and populations everywhere are grappling with a series of powerful social, economic and political shocks. There has never been safety in clinging to the status quo, but it is even less of an option now.

Read more →
June 23, 2020
May 21, 2020
When Is It Okay to Quit?
May 21, 2020

It’s said that quitters never win and winners never quit, but is this true? For highly motivated people, the drive to achieve can be a direct line to accomplishment or into a dead end. The key is the ability to discern when our goals no longer suit us. Ironically, this can be hardest for the best-motivated.

Read more →
May 21, 2020

Metal On The Move: Metal Legion Complete Series

July 01, 2022 in Science Fiction, Mil SF, Series

Metal Legion Complete Series Omnibus: Mechanized Warfare On A Galactic Scale, Craig Martelle (as CH Gideon) and Caleb Wachter. July, 2020.

 To wit:

 Scorpion's Fury

Frozen Fire

Hellfire

Lunar Assault

Watery Grave

Cry Havoc

Search & Destroy

End of War

The idea is a classic: a group of misfits battle to make the universe safe for humanity. They square off against various aliens, a galaxy-wide conspiracy, and the higher ups in their own military. Oh, and very occasionally each other. Finally, the menace is unraveled, although at a heavy toll in life, machines and munitions. Peace prevails.

 This is sweeping, combat-heavy, epic in scale and ambitious in concept. Compared to comparable series, very little in the series is done badly. Conversely, very little is exceptional either. I had no trouble maintaining my immersion in and enjoyment of the story, once I accepted the dominant point of view and a major style quirk, both outlined below. Lots of combat and a great premise, but I wanted more from it.

  •  The good: there is a ton of action, and Gideon/Martell and Wachter don’t let too much time elapse between episodes of fighting. The aliens were devious and enjoyable friends/enemies--they tended to help or hold back according to their own interests, mixing duplicity and friendship together in a remarkable display of political realism. There is an awesome heavy metal music theme/soundtrack.

  • ·The bad: there is a ton of action, and Gideon/Martell and Wachter don’t let too much time elapse between episodes of fighting. There is character development, just not much and it’s spotty and uneven. Star mech driver Xi in particular disappointed -- she starts off as a believable misfit, grows up just enough to be interesting, takes on a really sophisticated semi-diplomatic challenge which she handles with grace, accrues steady promotions -- and by the last two books is back to treating mankind’s most important allies and the species’ existential crisis with one-dimensional flippancy. Lee “Leroy” Jenkins (hah!) hints at being a commander with a dark and twisty past, but only hints at it. Et cetera…

  •   The ugly: patchy world-building. This has an almost “operations research SF” flavor. Battles have lengthy and excruciatingly detailed counts of how many of which type of projectile were fired, at which point and how they are shot down or intercepted, missed, hit the target, and how much damage they inflicted. I found myself skipping through battles to avoid this. This same level of detail is rarely applied to characters or back story. This is too bad--the authors are clearly talented enough to pull that off.

ml1_cover thumb.jpg ml2_cover thumb.jpg ml3_cover thumb.jpg ml4_cover thumb.jpg ml5_cover thumb.jpg ml6_cover thumb.jpg ml7_cover thumb.jpg ml8_cover thumb.jpg

 The “this guy has too much time on his hands” annex to the review:

 I’d expected this would be a couple of days’ reading followed by a three-sentence review, but something here resonated. Described as “mechanized warfare on a galactic scale”, the series over-delivers on the mechanized part but skimps on the “galactic scale”. It’s maybe more accurately described as “mechanized warfare over galactic-scale distances”, but I felt teased there' wasn’t something a little more strategic.

 I thought that this series excellently captures a broadly American perspective on and understanding of war -- specifically, the allure of and fascination with the tactical and technical levels of war at the expense of wider views or questions. (Think of the average Quora discussion thread on WW2 tanks, for example.)

That’s not to say the authors (or we more broadly) don’t realize there is history or a strategic outlook lurking behind all the fighting. It’s just that those things are secondary to the sheer joy of mounting up, heading in and smashing the enemy into righteous submission (whether doing that is appropriate or not.)

 This comes across in the preferred perspective of the books: the view from the commander’s cupola of individual mechs (think tanks on steroids), which is interspersed with reflections from people who aren’t in mechs but clearly would rather be. The authors clearly know there’s more to this, but generally keep a laser focus on fighting and the mechanics of combat.

 There is weirdly little curiosity about the larger sinews of war beyond the technical/tactical level, considering how lovingly that level is crafted. There is joint and combined stuff (not all of it combat!) and the operational level of war appears briefly. The strategic level of war appears as an extra in a couple of crowd scenes. Even the human terrain--well, technically the “xeno-human terrain”-- of the Terrans’ enemies and allies is explored only enough to set up the plot in broad strokes.

I kept thinking while reading that knowingly or not, the books reflect a popular understanding of how we — Americans — fought, and understood the fighting of, some recent wars. I thought this was both remarkable and a limiter on the story--it’s SF, after all! And look, I’m not suggesting I’d want Carl von Clausewitz or Thomas Schelling writing military sci-fi. (Dr. Strangelove was more than enough, thanks.) But most of the genre doesn’t even get as far towards the big picture as Metal Legion, which made it a bit disappointing to me that the series went right up to the edge…and then stepped back to the tactical level.

 Whether this focus serves us well as a country is open for debate. This doesn’t matter for these books, though, because the stars are the mech drivers, the crews and the machines themselves. And there is a great deal of curiosity about how they do their jobs reflected in how the story is told. Judging from other reviews, this is a strong draw.

To be a bit contrarian, I was bothered by the books’ “uncreative anachronism” factor. Although set in the future (one to which Martelle doesn’t seem to feel obliged to attach a date) a weirdly extensive amount of things seem to have been imported from the 20th/21st centuries. The authors can’t use the term “depleted uranium” enough. The infantry have powered armor but carry RPGs . At least one .50 caliber anti-material rifle shows up. It’s capable--as we are told in an operations research moment--of a 3 round, 8cm group fired in 3 seconds by a gruff but preternaturally talented sergeant major.

 While missiles are available in short-, medium-, and long-range versions it’s sometimes unclear what that means in practice. (Also, since we’re on the subject: when you fire one in space in a vacuum, does a missile go “ballistic” when it loses guidance? I don’t think that’s exactly it. But they do here.) And while there is a plot twist that explains why, all of the various hostile factions with the partial exception of the galactic-scale genocide-masterminding bad guys basically are packing the exact same loadouts. This all seemed very low-effort.

 But it was still readable and enjoyable--it didn’t feel like 1699 pages and I had no trouble persuading myself to keep flicking pages. The point of SF is to entertain, and this does.

 Smirk factor: 0verdone: 0 pts (131 smirks; 56 “I say again”; 32 “capital grade” without explaining what that is; 79 uses of “tungsten” (projectiles); and 25 depleted uranium things.)

Immersion factor: Chest high: 1.5 pts

Writing quality: Average: 1 pt

Character/plot development: Average: 1 pt

Innovative/interesting: High: 2pts (Just fun.)

Total: 5.5/10

 

Tags: Martelle, Metal Legion, Heavy Metal, Gideon, Wachter
← Labor Day Labor of Reading LoveA Master of Djinn →
Back to Top

email: sjr@gmx.us
phone: (571) 366-9110